martes, 19 de junio de 2012

Study guide to "Spring Awakening" by Frank Wedekind

Spring Awakening is a play written in 1891 by Frank Wedekind (1864-1918), a German playwright. The work depicts schoolchildren in a German provincial town in the 1890s whose struggle to reconcile their budding sexual feelings and the moral code of their society leads them to tragedy. 

Biography of Frank Wedekind

Benjamin Franklin Wedekind was a German playwright who worked in Munich between the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. He is considered a forerunner of expressionism as well as the theater of the absurd. Unable to reconcile himself with the naturalistic trends in theater supported by most of Munich’s artists, Wedekind propagated an early expressionist approach whose purpose was to delve beneath the surface of reality. Wedekind’s work shows his lifelong antagonism toward the moral code of the bourgeoisie. Irritated by what he saw as the hypocrisy of German society’s attitude toward sexuality, Wedekind shows in plays such as Spring Awakening the tragedies that can result from repression and societal pretense. He was one of the first to present frank depictions of teenage sexuality, homoeroticism, and masturbation on the stage, and his disregard for conventional morality caused many to dismiss him as a pornographer. He faced frequent censorship throughout his working life.

Plot Summary

In Act I, we are first introduced to the three main characters and their responses to their budding sexual consciousness. The play opens with 14 year-old Wendla Bergmann asking her mother where babies come from, insisting that she is too old to believe in the stork. Meanwhile, her classmates Moritz Stiefel and Melchior Gabor discuss their “masculine stirrings” after school. Moritz struggles with feelings of shame and guilt because of his sexual dreams, while Melchior tries to reassure him and agrees to write a pamphlet detailing his knowledge of sexual reproduction. In the next scene, Wendla and her friends discuss boys, but the conversation turns solemn when Martha reveals that her father beats her every night. This confession reveals a masochistic streak in Wendla, who envies Martha’s experience. In the final scene, Melchior asks Wendla why she participates in charity work, and when she answers that it makes her happy, he insists that altruism is only a veil for selfish desire. The scene ends with a discussion of Martha’s abuse, and Wendla begs Melchior to beat her, which he does.

In Act II, the combination of ignorance and sexual awakening begins to have tragic consequences for the teenagers. Melchior and Moritz have a discussion about the pamphlet Melchior has made as well as Moritz’s struggles in school. Wendla, meanwhile, again begs her mother for an explanation of where babies come from, and her mother finally responds that babies result from a woman loving her husband with all her heart and soul. This is followed by a scene in which Hansy Rillow, another classmate, masturbates to ancient paintings. In the next scene, Wendla climbs up to a hayloft to meet Melchior, where their initial embarrassment from their previous meeting evolves into an ambiguous sexual scene in which Melchior appears to rape Wendla. The final scenes reveal Moritz’s mounting frustration with his school troubles and shame because of his grotesque sexual thoughts. His classmate Ilse offers him a chance at sexual bliss, but he turns her down and commits suicide.

In Act III, the full impact of the teenagers’ ignorance and the pretension of the adult world results in yet another death and an inquiry into the moral code of society. In the first scene, incompetent school administrators find Melchior’s sex pamphlet and determine that it was the cause of Moritz's suicide; Melchior is expelled. Melchior’s parents, shocked by the knowledge of his expulsion and his behavior with Wendla, labor over the decision of whether to send him to a penitentiary. Meanwhile, Wendla has become pregnant and her mother calls for a doctor, who prescribes abortion pills and reassures Wendla that she is only suffering from anemia. Her mother, however, demands an explanation from Wendla, who insists that she cannot be pregnant because she isn’t married. A homoerotic scene between Hansy Rillow and Ernst Roebel follows, and finally we encounter Melchior alone in a graveyard, where he stumbles upon the fresh grave of Wendla Bergmann. Distraught and guilt-ridden, Melchior meets the dead Moritz, who offers him a chance to end his life. They are interrupted, however, by the appearance of a Masked Man, who attests that the conventional morality is nonsense.


Themes

Generational conflict: The lack of positive adult characters in the play is an attempt by Wedekind to show the way in which older generations fail younger ones by forcing them to conform to societal standards. Wendla’s mother refuses to tell her the truth about human sexuality, and the result is Wendla’s pregnancy and later death by a botched abortion. Moritz’s father accepts the societal definition of success, and Moritz’s bad grades subsequently lead him to suicide. Finally, school administrators expel Melchior for creating a sex pamphlet, hoping to shift the blame of Moritz’s suicide to him and avoid their own responsibility.

Social taboos: The presence of teenage sexuality, abortion, homosexuality, masturbation, rape, etc. in the play show an attempt to force audiences of the early 1900s to confront issues that were not discussed in polite society. The teachers and parental figures in Spring Awakening, representative of bourgeois society, refuse to speak about these things, and the result is the death of two teenagers.

Morality: In Spring Awakening, Wedekind presents morality as a social construction. He blames the tragic ending of the play on the hypocritical moral code of society, or, as Leroy Shaw puts it, “an attitude toward it based on an exaggerated sense of piety and a false notion of what morality really is."


Application to Modernism

Spring Awakening is generally considered a modernist work. In the Cambridge Introduction to Modernism, Pericles Lewis describes the modernist crisis of representation as “a crisis in what could be represented and a crisis of how it should be represented."

In Spring Awakening, Frank Wedekind shows “what could be represented” in the form of the world beneath the surface of bourgeois life in German society. In tune with the modernist enthusiasm for “newness,” Wedekind not only includes social taboos, but also makes them integral to the action of the play, key examples being Moritz’s suicide and Wendla’s abortion. The stiff, unsympathetic world of the adults is also a depiction of the world beneath the surface. The exaggerated incompetence of the school administrators and the lack of human feeling in any of the parents represent an adult world that forces the next generation to conform to its standards of behavior or be left behind.

Wedekind in this play confronts the problem of “how the subject could be represented” with “fragmented dialogue, frenetic episodes, a distortion of natural phenomena to arrive at the true center, and... isolation as seen in the tendency of characters to talk past rather than at one another." These are defining modernist techniques influenced by the revolutionary figure of Georg Buechner. Examples of fragmented, unrealistic dialogue in the play include the awkward and insincere language Frau Gabor uses in her letter to Moritz and the dated, poetic language used by Melchior and Moritz to discuss their future lives. Wedekind also experiments with a nonrealistic theater, creating a surreal graveyard scene in which the dead Moritz returns from the grave, and the mystery figure of the Masked Man explains the meaning of their experiences. As Shaw writes, “In rejecting the notion that reality is to be found in actuality,Spring Awakening begins that destruction of illusionistic theatre which had continued into our own time." The Masked Man’s important words in the final scene reveal Wedekind’s attempt to unearth morality from its deep-rooted place in society and present it as a social construction.

Synopsis: "The life of Galileo" by Bertolt Brecht

Scene 1. Padua, 1609, Galileo’s study
ANDREA SARTI, the young son of Galileo Galilei’s housekeeper, examines a model of the solar system as it is understood to exist, with the Earth at its centre. GALILEO is prepared to challenge that belief: “I have made discoveries we can no longer withhold from the world.” He demonstrates Copernicus’ findings that the earth moves round the sun and Andrea, finally convinced by the explanation that it is possible for the earth to rotate without its inhabitants feeling ‘upside down’, relishes the opportunity to upset his mother with this latest heretical discovery.

LUDOVICO, a rich young man from Holland, wants to “understand science”. Galileo agrees to teach him since there’s money in the venture. Ludovico talks of a new invention on the Dutch markets – a telescope.

The CHANCELLOR of the University visits. Galileo borrows one scudi from him and sends Andrea off to buy lenses from the lens grinder. The Chancellor cannot approve a rise in Galileo’s salary since he gives only two lectures per week and receives the university’s protection against the Inquisition.
Galileo has freedom to practice science. The Chancellor suggests that he would make money from inventing something. Andrea returns with the lenses and Galileo warns him not to disclose any details of their recent conversations to anyone.
 
Scene 2. Venice 1609
Galileo presents his new invention, the telescope, to a crowd of dignitaries, claiming it is the result of 17 years’ research. Galileo’s daughter, VIRGINIA, brings Ludovico to pay his compliments to her father: “You have made the cover red. In Holland it was green.”
 
Scene 3. Padua 1610. Galileo’s study
SAGREDO examines the moon through the telescope. Galileo explains that the light he can see is not the moon’s own, but reflected from the earth. Sagredo fears his friend will go the way of Giordano Bruno, the man burned at the stake for claiming that the moon and the earth are the same. The Chancellor arrives having learned that a cargo of telescopes from Holland has arrived in Venice. The instrument is worthless and he is offended by Galileo’s fraud: “I showed you nothing but kindness and you have made me a laughingstock in the city of my birth.”

Galileo confides to Sagredo that Jupiter’s four satellites move, making it another sun, just as the Copernicans had claimed. When Sagredo asks where God fits into this scheme, he is alarmed to hear Galileo repeat Bruno’s sentiment: “In us or nowhere.”

Galileo plans to move to Florence and be accepted at Court, to infiltrate and begin to prove his discoveries. He resolves to give the Pope and his monks all the evidence they need to believe him, more evidence than Copernicus’ “scribblings.” Sagredo warns him not to provoke the Pope: already his monks and princes are laying traps. “Galileo, I saw you on your own pyre. I beg you, do not go.”
 
Scene 4. Florence. 1610. Galileo’s study
The nine-year-old Grand Duke of Florence, COSIMO DE MEDICI, visits to see Galileo’s telescope, which the Court astronomers have dismissed as “rubbish.” Andrea forgets his order to remain silent, and pushes the Duke to believe that the earth goes around the sun.

Galileo discreetly conceals the Copernican model and then invites the Duke, a
MATHEMATICIAN and a PHILOSOPHER to look at the new ‘Medicean’ stars, the satellites around Jupiter. They refuse, thinking it unnecessary to have new planets, and questioning whether this telescope will even show them the truth of the heavens. When the men protest that Galileo’s argument conflicts with “divine Aristotle”, he reminds them that Aristotle did not have a telescope.

He impresses on them that many citizens, by virtue of owning a telescope, will be able to see stars they did not know to exist, leading them to question the dogma they have been taught. The philosophers escort the Duke away, telling Galileo that his ideas will be considered by Clavius, the papal astronomer.
 
Scene 5. Rome, 1616
Galileo sits in a corridor. Two monks openly mock his ideas but do not address him. An old CARDINAL passes, branding Galileo an “enemy of humanity” and elucidating the fear of the Church: why would God send his Son to live on a “minor, transient star?” But when CLAVIUS passes, he utters “he is right.”
Galileo’s victory is bittersweet: as he departs, he encounters the CARDINAL INQUISITOR.
 
Scene 6. Rome, 1616, a ball at Cardinal Bellarmine’s

Galileo sends his daughter to dance with Ludovico as he waits for the cardinals BELLARMINE and BARBERINI. When they appear, the former instructs the latter to humour Galileo’s ideas, unless they contradict the Bible. The clerks are permitted to minute some of the conversation. Refusing to hear that God may not have imposed the structure they believe on the universe, the cardinals tell Galileo that only hours before, the Holy Office rejected Copernicus’ teachings. The questions around Jupiter were not even considered. Galileo must now abandon his belief and may only research under the terms of mathematical hypothesis. After they depart, the Cardinal Inquisitor collects the transcripts from the clerks and meets Virginia, to whom he insinuates the importance of supporting her father: “I must tell you, the time will come. He will need you.”
 
Scene 7. Rome, 1616, The home of the Florentine Ambassador
The LITTLE MONK, a physicist, has decided to give up astronomy, prompted by his deep unease at Galileo’s findings about Jupiter: – “unrestricted research is a danger to humanity” – and by his fear that humankind would feel lost to learn that everything they have hitherto believed about the universe is actually an error, effectively removing their “comforts of faith”. But Galileo disputes that the Church is not justified in lying to the people, making them suffer under order, servitude and poverty and treating them as “mindless.” He cannot deny the truth. He throws a pile of manuscripts before the Little Monk who gathers them up and immediately begins to read.

Scene 8. Florence, 1624. Galileo’s house
Virginia prepares for her wedding. Andrea, the Little Monk and FEDERZONI prepare to experiment. Galileo, now losing his sight, sits apart, immersed in a book. He has earned a great reputation across Europe, he assumes by virtue of remaining silent. The scientists begin to investigate ‘floating bodies’. Ludovico appears unexpectedly. While his fiancée fetches her wedding dress, he announces that the Pope is dying and Barberini is expected to succeed: “a scientist on the Papal throne!” This lifts Galileo’s spirits enough to decide to return at once – despite the dangers – to his studies of the “earthround- the-sun.” He realises that Ludovico will be concerned by this because his future wife may not be accepted as “godly” on account of her father’s disobedience. SIGNORA SARTI reminds Galileo that he has no right to jeopardise his daughter’s happiness, but he does not listen. Ludovico fears his reputation too much, and leaves without saying goodbye to Virginia. As the men set back to work, Virginia returns, realises what her father has done, and collapses to the ground.
 
Scene 9. An Italian city, 1632. A carnival
Carnival-goers celebrate Galileo’s fame.
 
Scene 10. Florence, 1633. The Palace
Galileo waits to present his latest book to the Grand Duke. Virginia suspects they are being watched by a gentleman who sits quietly nearby. VANNI, an industrialist, approaches to lend his support and that of the world of commerce to Galileo’s efforts: they want to see Italy move forward. But his suggestion that Galileo would do better to work from Venice is met with scorn. The Cardinal Inquisitor passes silently, bowing to Galileo as he goes. Cosimo de Medici also greets Galileo but leaves almost immediately without the book, which arouses Virginia’s suspicions further. Her father hurries them out, having
already made arrangements for a coach to take them away in case of need, but they are stopped by the Official, who tells Galileo he is to be sent to the Holy Inquisition.
 
Scene 11. Rome, 1633, the Vatican
As Barberini, now POPE URBAN VIII, is being robed, the Inquisitor insists that Galileo’s mathematical charts should be destroyed, warning that if the people start to doubt the Vatican – as they are – it won’t be long before they doubt the Gospel. The Pope is sure of Galileo’s genius, and asks that they leave the
man alone. But, irritated by the Inquisitor’s persistence and by the interminable noise of shuffling in the corridors, he relents, allowing the Inquisitor to threaten Galileo by showing him – at the very most – “the instruments”.
 
Scene 12. Rome, 1633
Galileo’s pupils and his daughter wait anxiously for news: they are sure that Galileo will not recant under pressure, which may result in his execution. AN OFFICIAL announces that Galileo is due to recant at 5pm and to signal the moment, bells will be rung. Virginia kneels, praying loudly. At three minutes past five, with no signal sounding, the pupils rejoice that Galileo has not recanted. Soon their celebrations are broken by the bells ringing, and Galileo appears, tired and frail, to be derided by his friends.

Scene 13. Countryside near Florence, 1637
A surprise gift of two plucked geese is delivered for Virginia and Galileo, and she sends them off with their GUARD-MONK to be roasted. Andrea visits unexpectedly to take news of Galileo’s health on his travels to Amsterdam; Virginia insists on listening to their conversation. Andrea explains the effect of Galileo’s recantation as having stifled the work of other scientists. Virginia is sent away and, promising that Andrea is harmless, persuades the monk to leave them alone as well. Galileo confides to his old friend that he has started writing again and has finished his Discorsi. Although his writings are usually locked away each night, he has managed to secretly make a copy, which he suggests could be smuggled to Amsterdam if Andrea wanted. Suddenly excited by this prospect, Andrea admits his feelings towards Galileo have now altered: “When you recanted, I should have realised, you had a reason.” But Galileo claims he had no strategy and berates himself for betraying his profession. Virginia appears and corrects him: “you have been received into the ranks of the faithful.”
 
Scene 14. The Italian Frontier, 1637.
Andrea appears at the frontier, concealing the Discorsi under his coat. The guard searches him and finds the book, but when told it is in Latin, shows no interest and sends Andrea on his way, through the frontier.

domingo, 17 de junio de 2012

Mi reseña sobre "Die Weber" de Gerhart Hauptmann.

Gerhart Hauptmann nació en Obersalzbrunn (actual Szczawno Zdrój, Polonia), pero es considerado uno de los grandes dramaturgos, novelistas y poetas más importantes del naturalismo alemán. Tanto es así que incluso es mencionado en el último capítulo de A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man de James Joyce, donde los árboles cargados de lluvia de las avenidas de Dublín, evocaban al protagonista, Stephen Dedalus, las chicas y las mujeres de las obras de Hauptmann.

Gerhart Hauptmann representa una de las figuras más altas del naturalismo alemán, ya que consigue la realización de una obra que consigue describir las situaciones exacta y fielmente, de la matriz de las cuales surge una literatura intensa y obsesionada. Los seres humanos expuestos en su obra están inseparablemente transferidos a sus impulsos y su medio, de tal forma que no les queda ninguna libertad de decisión; "son criaturas que sufren sin rebelarse, víctimas de oscuras potencias; han perdido la fuerza para regirse a sí mismas, y parecen desgobernadas". Centrándose en su propio sufrimiento, Hauptmann se transforma en el anatomista de la fehaciente sociedad burguesa.

En la obra de Hauptmann se puede observar una ética de la compasión social, apoyada en un sentimiento de ecos cristianos, dando al naturalismo la profundidad que faltara en sus inicios. Hauptmann se preocupa por los problemas sociales, creando una representación realista de las disputas de la clase obrera. Su obra cuenta la desintegración moral de un grupo de familias campesinas que se han enriquecido de repente al descubrirse carbón en sus tierras.

En su desasosiego por los agentes del entorno y de la herencia que determinan la vida del individuo, su obra es el primer ejemplo de teatro naturalista en Alemania. Los tejedores, escrita en 1892 es una manifestación perfecta de lo antes expuesto, la tragedia es la historia de una comunidad de necesidades tejedores de Silesia, en los que las máquinas dejan sin medios para poder continuar. Los tejedores es una obra que no representa el drama de un solo hombre, por el contrario, es el drama de todo un sector del pueblo que se une en torno a la propia angustia generada por su realidad. Unos hombres que sufren en carne viva, que se irritan y se rebelan contra sus explotadores, y, al fin y al cabo, acaban por ser sometidos y subyugados por la fuerza.

Hauptmann deja en evidencia el pesimismo y la desesperanza que se desarrolla en su alma a verse suprimido por la realidad establecida. Hauptmann y su obra se construyen sobre la indignación ante la miseria humana y el sentimiento de su incurabilidad.

El autor estremece por su abundancia y su integridad. La vida de la que escribe es una vida hecha para el dolor, esta es la noción que obsesiona a este romántico del sentimiento soñador y contenido. La complejidad de su obra muestra que Hauptmann, inquieto y nunca convencido, fue dando vueltas al pesimista complejo de cuestiones que planteaba la época de la decadencia burguesa. "Hauptmann había tomado mucho de la amplitud cultural de la burguesía, pero también de su desconcierto y desorientación". (SCHNEIDER. 1956:147) Aunque en algunas oportunidades su obra resultara dañada para tratar de adaptarlas a las nuevas corrientes del discurso literario, nunca desmintió su fe en la humanidad y la compasión.